One of the most influential people to have existed that shaped a kind of psyche that saw the world and the inhabitants of the planet as slaves to their own sexual desires that had to be controlled or they would surely lead themselves to destruction. What was this man who had very little knowledge on how the whole world works possible teach us from the limitations of his analytical mind?
Often struggling from his own problems, incapable of solving his own problems, the method of control was implemented as a standard psychological function of paralysis by analysis. As if this has not been the goal of the organized religions for who knows how long which was to control human nature.
The human who has not gotten the chance to fully step into themselves yet was never even given a chance to get away from the vehicles of control that were disrupting his innately given harmony and peace. He was convince of his savage nature and that his savage nature was the real destroyer. However we know that nature has different functions and that even a Tiger has to protect his young by force, that does not make it primitive or wrong it just makes it a function of a phase in the lives of all beings, in that their behaviors are in the whole cosmic steps to learning.
We have a brain that compromises all of that and has managed to go beyond that with the function of trans-mutating itself in this lifetime, is it's own mental evolution. As we repeat these steps biologically in the womb, while we are alive we also go through the psychological degrees of learning about ourselves let's call it "flowering".
There are many that think the mammalian brain is useless. It's so erratic, it's emotional or sensitive it feels. Although it is vulnerable that does not mean we should look towards our crocodile mind and spend our lives living in a river praying on others for our own benefit. What kind of a life must that be. To be a slave to the source of people one enslaves by other means. That without others to do it for them, one would not have any ability of their own. Is the predator mind or the lack of mammalian mind truly what we regard as primitive and can we not use primitive or "primate" since we now must see irrefutably that it is not the primate mind but the remnants of the reptile mind that invade our primate existence, the rep-etitive brain that takes advantage of the senses and care for others.
Was Sigmund Freud's inability of his own mastery of his human self a reflection of the expectations he had of others that he himself could not uphold? What kind of a mind did Sigmund Freud leash? Others or himself actually?
Mr. Everything
Commenti